u/peppiminti wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
"That argument should go both ways then for anything" Michael, that was MY point lol. Don't act like it was yours. You're the one who kept generalizing and condemning Codesmith students while excusing Formation students over similar things. I'm the one who's saying the argument
u/michaelnovati replied · ★ FEATURED
I want to restate using a different past example I've said before:
One of the things I spoke about was the git contributor graphs on all the open source projects being like spikes. There are no 'legit' open source projects that have these patterns. That makes Codesmith's open source projects very different from say Firefox or React or Angular, etc...
The same analogy applies here. How Formation people represent their resumes is completely different than how Codesmith people do fundamentally because the underlying goods are different.
I'm sure there are rogue Formation people and rogue Codesmith people that have out of date LinkedIns and who classified things wrong.
Even the fact that the boxes are under "experience" itself is irrelevant to my point.
There could be problems with A and not B, with A and B, with not A and not B, A and B need to be independent and not compared in my opinion.