u/peppiminti wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
I get the due diligence thing but it does feels like you're a bit biased towards trying to prove my experience wrong. Don't love that you would edit your messages AFTER I responded and I wouldn't have noticed it if I didn't go back to reread. You don't really do that for people w
u/michaelnovati replied · ★ FEATURED
Every person got SWE jobs in a bunch of cohorts was the thing that stood out yeah. It's quite inconsistent with three of my sources.
I have a ton of typos because I use voice to text and on my phone so I edit a lot of messages to reword but I agree with you to watch out on editing.
So the scope of what people say matters and how they say it.
If you say something is an option or observation then it's different from saying something is fact.
If you say something is a fact I will diligently review far more than if you say it's an opinion.
Many opinions that align can be useful even if it's not a fact based conclusion.
And sometimes one very specific fact.... like evidence Codesmith paid someone to go after me on Reddit can mean a heck of a lot even if its limited to a specific situation.