u/endlightend wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
My point stands: what is the point of repeating something that isn't publicly verifiable or cannot be substantiated with evidence? You are supplying them with ammunition that this is a personal vendetta for you. From what I've seen, you have always been able to back up your other
u/michaelnovati replied ·
I mean I don't know what's confidential but there were private legal processes involved and the sourcing seems good, I just can't source publicly so I have to say allegidly.