u/CI-AI wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
I think the sample is off here, respectfully. I’m not surprised by your results honestly- but you surveyed engineers at large tech companies from what it sounds like (and let’s say “large” as they have enough engineers to have dedicated ML teams). Just looking at jobs on Linked
u/michaelnovati replied ·
Yeah that wouldn't surprise me that recruiters look for AI as a sign you are staying up with the times, passionate about the latest and greatest, able to learn fast.
I believe that can be demonstrated in more ways than just AI skills but it's a good point to mention. Like if it helps you stand out to a recruiter and is irrelevant to the interviews themselves then maybe it's worth it as a top of funnel strategy.
Since posting, the outcomes are the same overall, but there is some really good discussion I'll try to summarize if I get the chance.
The concensus is that an engineer needs to be a problem solver and not having strong general skills will not be compensated for by AI skills, which is the argument I was making as well - taking it a step farther that in a time limited learning environment, one would apply this by focusing more on general skills and minimally on AI (maybe for resume purposes for example, like you pointed out was effective).