← Timeline

Line-by-Line Critique of CIRR Standard Document. Opinion: good intentioned organization but spec is not rigorous and robust and I point out all of the problems that make it one of the weaker specifications I've read in my opinion.

r/codingbootcamp

u/WagonBashers wrote (the comment Michael replied to):

TLDR: good intentions, poor execution. Of course, we won't ever see a rebuttal or response to this. 

u/michaelnovati replied ·
Just crazy high downvotes