Niceee

I have a draft ready but I need to polish a lot haha. I would read the Interviewing,io post though, that's much more thorough than what I'm writing, I'm writing trends I'm observing in the bootcamp industry and not so much a data driven view of the market. It's a very tricky subject because the market will start off good for mid level and senior and this problematic in this subreddit because 1. my company actually helps real mid level and senior people and therefore this argument looks self promoting 2. Codesmith claims to create mid level and senior engineers and the grads think they are those titles, but what [Interviewing.io](https://Interviewing.io) and me are talking about is FAANG-canonical mid level and senior roles, and they require 2+ years of REAL work experience to get them. Given my post last week about Codesmith LinkedIn profiles I feel like this is going to be a can of worms to unpack and I have to think about how to approach that. Like I actually expect Codesmith placements to pick up from the side effects of this, but not in canonical mid level+ roles. I expect 2 people a cohort to squeeze through to some kind of FAANG-ish role as well and post on Reddit and make it seem like all the grads can get those sweet mid level FAANG roles that they read about on [Interviewing.io](https://Interviewing.io) and create a false narrative around that. So I have to figure out how to make my arguments really sound and clear and make sure my language is really well defined and clear of what I mean. Before of 1 I want to have some people check it over to make sure I don't express bias or don't properly disclose where I have biases.