u/InTheDarkDancing wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
> Am I wrong in asking this "violation" (i.e. inconsistency with CIRR standards) be disclosed by the auditors in the report because it's not for Codesmith to decide what rules they choose to follow and not disclose in the official paperwork, or do you think this rule breaking is
u/michaelnovati replied · · edited ★ FEATURED
I think this reply characterizes the controversy as I see it as it represents the attitude that Codesmith itself has about things.
I went to an info session once where the one of the speakers 'We're ready, ask us the hard questions' followed with a bunch of thumbs up emojis. So I asked passive agressively (anonymously) 'How did you get your current job 8 months ago' (because their LinkedIn showed they were employed as a Software Engineer at their OSP - no "OSP" - the company didn't say "Open Source" in a single place, or OSLabs. NO RESPONSE. No emojis, no acknowledge, like it wasn't even asked.
Like you can't say give me all the hard questions and then only answer the hard questions you want.
This attitude is pervasive at Codesmith and in this subreddit.