u/fluffyr42 wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
I agree about taking review sites/CIRR (or any outcomes numbers) with a grain of salt. Review sites are always going to attract very positive or very negative reviews, and rarely anything in between. As for outcomes numbers, I think it's a good sign if a bootcamp's numbers are au
u/michaelnovati replied · ★ FEATURED
\+1 to this. We're working on some form of outcomes reporting at Formation. It's so hard to try to communicate outcomes. Not just trying to showoff big numbers to win some imaginary contest, but to show numbers that help a prospective engineer figure out if the program is right for them or not, like outcomes by incoming engineer experience levels, and outcomes by location.
CIRR assumed everyone in a bootcamp would have no experience and so it doesn't differentiate people at different experience levels. And CIRR standards were last updated before COVID played out and a lot of jobs moved to remote.