u/Fabulous_Project3859 wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
That’s a good point. It’s really hard to get a real sense of bootcamp outcomes because on reddit, various subreddits will have their respective biases, and even the reported outcomes on CIRR or those given by bootcamps on their own sites dont distinguish the outcomes by the degre
u/michaelnovati replied · ★ FEATURED
Always reach out to people who did the program and ask for specific details of day to day and specific anecdotal outcomes for people with a similar background to you.
Humans are humans and the adjectives we use to describe things are relative to our experiences. So rather than just "this was amazing" you want to know examples of why it's amazing.
Programing is not magic and an array is an array. So what makes one program better. Why are Codesmith's CIRR outcomes actually better? with examples. Not just "we teach people depth and how to think". Like what is it objectively that makes those outcomes happen. For example, this is more specific ''We test and oberseve what job hunt strategies work for alumni to get jobs and we double down on them and adapt, so we are always teaching people the job hunting strategies that are working and guide students on how to implement fhem'
Sorry for the rant, bootcamps use too fluffy inflated language.