Please note, these are personal opinions, I'm not recommending or not recommending any specific program in these comments and just looking at numbers.
(This is a bit messy, just dumped some scratch notes)
\[IN PROGRAM EDITING, moe coming\]
​
SOME NOTES: "Intermediate Full-time Coding Bootcamp", Page 8
I'm considering this only because it's the bread and butter program in my opinion. It's competitive to the other top programs.
Enrolled Students 363
143 (124 + 19) had full time jobs in field afterwards (full time + apprenticeship/internship)
**Which is a 40% placement rate of full time job in field of all people who started.**
Now the market is bad, and Hack Reactor 12 week full time immersive didn't change much (the 19 week did in 2023).
[So compare to H1 2022](https://www.galvanize.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/20221-GRAD-Report-Final.pdf) \-
236 + 23 + 93 + 132 = 484 grads (across the 4 time options)
227 had full time jobs in field afterwards (full time + apprenticeship/internship)
**Which is a 47% placement rate of full time job in field of all people who started.**
# 1. So we that's about a 15% drop in placement full time in field within 6 months, which is anecdotally consistent with other programs.
u/scarykicks wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
So basically just shows that they over 80% of students still looking. Wonder what the number is. Also what's the number of the passive track?
u/michaelnovatireplied·· edited
The "passive track" is people who graduated and hung around but didn't apply to an average of 10 jobs a week. The detailed stats don't bread down across those lines but their top level "success rate" does.
Also it doesn't look like 80% are still looking. It looks like up to 33% of people got are still looking or ghosting, but on the flip side, 40% of enrollees got full time jobs in field, so there are a chunk of people with out of field, temporary, or dropped out too.
u/lawschoolredux wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
“I’ll give you a secret. Auditor’s letters at the end of outcomes reports: they’re meaningless.”
u/michaelnovatireplied·· edited
Honestly the auditor letter is more detailed than other ones though. It says the same size they looked at and confirmed the calculations used.