u/beastkara wrote (the comment Michael replied to):
2-3 years? By that point they have 2-3 years of his experience. So in other words, it's very good for them compared to where they started. If they can't get where they need to be at the good job in that time frame to find another decent job, they aren't going to make it anyway.
u/michaelnovati replied ·
Well my point is the people I've worked with in that bucket, have a hard time knowing what to do for their next job. They might actually want to downlevel to a lower level where they will get support on the job to fill in their gaps.
The group I've people I've talked to about this are people who have lied to enter at a mid-level role when they have no experience, so it might be a bias sample.
Those people have a lot of gaps and now that they have real experience, going for an entry level role requiring "4 years of experience" might be best as the second jump.